<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://osintcommons.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Maine%27s_Legalized_IGaming_Bill_Faces_Last_Major_Obstacle</id>
	<title>Maine&#039;s Legalized IGaming Bill Faces Last Major Obstacle - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://osintcommons.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Maine%27s_Legalized_IGaming_Bill_Faces_Last_Major_Obstacle"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://osintcommons.org/index.php?title=Maine%27s_Legalized_IGaming_Bill_Faces_Last_Major_Obstacle&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-07T14:17:40Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://osintcommons.org/index.php?title=Maine%27s_Legalized_IGaming_Bill_Faces_Last_Major_Obstacle&amp;diff=60474&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Drew91K845829: Created page with &quot;&lt;br&gt;Maine inched closer to legalizing online casino video gaming, however a major challenge remains.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- LD 1164 calls for an 18% tax on online casino video gaming operators.&lt;br&gt;- Gov. Janet Mills could ban the expense, likely ending [https://harry.main.jp/mediawiki/index.php/%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8%E8%80%85:RoseanneWynn Maine&#039;s opportunities] of  iGaming this year.&lt;br&gt;- The proposition took a winding political roadway to reach the unique appropriations table.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://osintcommons.org/index.php?title=Maine%27s_Legalized_IGaming_Bill_Faces_Last_Major_Obstacle&amp;diff=60474&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-05-03T02:01:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Maine inched closer to legalizing online casino video gaming, however a major challenge remains.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;- LD 1164 calls for an 18% tax on online casino video gaming operators.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;- Gov. Janet Mills could ban the expense, likely ending [https://harry.main.jp/mediawiki/index.php/%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8%E8%80%85:RoseanneWynn Maine&amp;#039;s opportunities] of  iGaming this year.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;- The proposition took a winding political roadway to reach the unique appropriations table.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Maine inched closer to legalizing online casino video gaming, however a major challenge remains.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;- LD 1164 calls for an 18% tax on online casino video gaming operators.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;- Gov. Janet Mills could ban the expense, likely ending [https://harry.main.jp/mediawiki/index.php/%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8%E8%80%85:RoseanneWynn Maine&amp;#039;s opportunities] of  iGaming this year.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;- The proposition took a winding political roadway to reach the unique appropriations table.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The state&amp;#039;s Senate, accepting your house, positioned authorized LD 1164, an iGaming expense, on the &amp;quot;special appropriations table&amp;quot; Wednesday. The proposition is among 100 costs headed to Gov. Janet Mills&amp;#039; desk, the Maine Morning Star reported. Mills has 10 days to sign and enact the iGaming procedure.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;However, Mills might ban the costs, and the legislature, which currently adjourned, would likely not override it this year. While she hasn&amp;#039;t spoken openly about the legislation, Mills hasn&amp;#039;t favored other gaming efforts. She shot down 2 [https://www.yatesgear.com/index.php?route=journal3/blog/post&amp;amp;journal_blog_post_id=4 sports betting] attempts before reaching a compromise to allow legal sportsbooks to [https://www.lernen-aktiv.de/index.php?title=User:NKBJulio9473 operate] in 2022.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;There is already noted opposition to the proposal. The Maine Department of Health and Human Services and the Gambling [https://todoequipos.net/index.php?route=journal3/blog/post&amp;amp;journal_blog_post_id=4 Control Board] Chair affirmed versus the expense, providing concerns about problem [https://code.stephenscity.gov/index.php/User:TerranceDuarte gambling] and financial impacts to in-person casinos. In a state where DraftKings and Caesars run [http://wrgitlab.org/milliebuckland online sports] wagering through tribal partnerships, FanDuel, Fanatics, and BetMGM likewise [https://www.ge.infn.it/wiki//gpu/index.php?title=User:JanessaHowerton refuted] the law.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Creating &amp;#039;financial chance&amp;#039;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;LD 1164 is &amp;quot;an act to develop economic opportunity for the Wabanaki Nations through internet gaming.&amp;quot; Four licenses would go to the Passamaquoddy Tribe, [https://wiki.ithae.net/index.php?title=The_BET_9JA_Promotion_Code_This_2026_Is_YOHAIG Penobscot] Nation, Mi&amp;#039;kmaq Nation, and Houlton Band of [https://lebenskunst.berlin/index.php?title=Benutzer:Yasmin06J351 Maliseet Indians]. The tribes would then partner with iGaming operators.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;DraftKings and [http://ebc.co.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=portfolio_02&amp;amp;wr_id=316391 Caesars] both operate online gambling establishments in other U.S. jurisdictions, making them likely candidates to benefit right away from legal iGaming in Maine.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Online gambling establishment business would pay the state an 18% tax rate on their changed gaming revenue. That would produce an estimated $1.8 million in Year 1 and $3.6 million in financial year 2026-2027, according to a financial note added to the costs.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Maine&amp;#039;s online sports wagering operators created over $93.7 million in income from more than $835 million in bets considering that 2023. The Evergreen State filled its coffers with over $9 million from the 10% tax rate on [https://gummipuppen-wiki.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:JasmineNicoll32 sportsbooks].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Windy road&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Getting LD 1164 to Mills&amp;#039; desk wasn&amp;#039;t easy. Your house committee [https://corona-untersuchungsausschuss.org/index.php?title=Benutzer:LesterFernando eliminated] the expense in April, however it was resurrected during June&amp;#039;s special session, when it was modified to increase the tax rate from 16% to 18%.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;After passing your home, the Senate pressed it through without a majority vote, [http://ossenberg.ch/index.php/Benutzer:DustinScaddan0 leaving] the House to enact it. Sen. [http://wiki.breedveld.net/index.php/User:WhitneyJude5 Peggy Rotundo] motioned to position the procedure on the [https://orb.tl/casey97z120584 special appropriations] table, stalling it while legislators were still writing the state budget.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Rotundo avoided voting on passing the proposal, leaving it to stop working by one vote, before keeping it alive by [https://harry.main.jp/mediawiki/index.php/%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8%E8%80%85:ValentinCassidy voting versus] a [https://cletina.com/blog/new-products/season-essentials movement] to turn down the costs. After Rotundo eliminated it from the unique appropriations table, the [http://labautowiki.org/wiki/User:KennithCabrera8 Senate lastly] passed it and moved it along.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Drew91K845829</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>